Tesla is reportedly now focusing its efforts on bringing to production the base version of the Model 3 at the long-promised base price of $35,000.

After a teardown of a Long Range version of the Model 3, UBS now throws some cold water on the effort saying that it would be unprofitable.

UBS analyst Colin Langan issued a new note to clients today explaining how the firm expects the Model 3 to be unprofitable with the upcoming standard battery pack based on their teardown of the current Model 3 with Long Range battery pack.

The analyst says that Tesla would be losing about $5,900 per car sold at that price.

According to their cost analysis, the $42,000 expected average sale price of the base Model 3 after a few options will bring in only about $620 of profit for Tesla – making the breakeven point at about $41,000.

Interestingly, that’s exactly what UBS claimed over a year ago after they made a similar analysis of the Model 3 cost, but they based it on a teardown of a Chevy Bolt EV.

Furthermore, UBS claims Tesla’s battery cost is $178 per kWh after tearing down a Model 3 Long Range.

The firm has come up with completely different results than other Model 3 teardowns. For example, Munro research said their Model 3 teardown showed over 30% profitability and a German teardown of the Model 3 showed only $28,000 in potential material and production costs.

UBS reiterated a sell rating on Tesla’s stock and a price target of $195 per share.

Colin Langan is one of the highest-ranking analysts on TipRanks: #580 out of 4,847 analysts with a success rate of 61% of and an average return of 11.2%. That said, he has historically made poor recommendations on Tesla’s stock:

Electrek’s Take

Alright, let me preface this by saying that I don’t know how much the base Model 3 will cost to make, UBS doesn’t know, and I am pretty sure Tesla doesn’t either at that point since it still a few months away from production.

That said, I think this screams of confirmation bias from UBS here.

They have made a prediction about this based on a completely flawed premise a year ago and now, their teardown of a Model 3 somehow confirms what they said about the car.

I think it’s worth noting that when they released their first analysis, we laughed at UBS’ logic of using their teardown of the Bolt EV, which is a completely different vehicle program than the Model 3, to come up with a cost analysis of an unreleased vehicle. Following that, the company tried multiple times to have our article taken down with a bunch of letters from lawyers.

In my opinion, they were looking to end up with that $41,000 breakeven point when doing their own teardown of the Model 3 in order to confirm what they had already claimed.

But that’s just my opinion. At this point, it’s more of a matter of believing Tesla and the other teardowns who have come up with much lower costs, or UBS.

I think it’s also worth mentioning that Tesla has a new battery module design that should go into production around the release of the base Model 3 and it is expected to further reduce battery costs.

Featured Image: by Ingineerix – Tesla Model 3 teardown gives incredible look at the electric powertrain

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.


Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

You’re reading Electrek— experts who break news about Tesla, electric vehicles, and green energy, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow Electrek on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our YouTube channel for the latest reviews.

About the Author