NHTSA submitted a recall report earlier this week for Daimler to recall all Mercedes electric B-Class over a problem with Tesla’s drivetrain. The report, which we embed below, perfectly highlights the need for over-the-air updates across the whole automotive industry. According to the filing, the recall is due to a problem with the gateway software of the electric powertrain, which is supplied by Tesla Motors, and affects all 2,618 Mercedes electric B-Class produced between November 2013 and May 2015. The fix is an update to the software according to Daimler, which the company will offer for free under the warranty, but owners will have to bring the vehicle to a Mercedes dealership rather than push an over-the-air update.
Daimler first became aware of the problem in April 2015 after a customer’s report. The company describes the problem:
DAG has determined that in rare cases on certain B-Class electric drive vehicles, the powertrain gateway control unit might send an incorrect signal for a very short duration regarding the status of the high voltage contactor. Should this occur, the vehicle would react to this signal by immediately powering down the electric powertrain unit. As a consequence, the propulsion power would be lost, temporarily immobilizing the vehicle. In such a case, the vehicle can be restarted using the ignition key.
After an internal investigation, the company decided to issue a recall. Electric B-Class owners should start receiving notifications to service the vehicle for an update in December.
Earlier this year, a report came out suggesting that Mercedes doesn’t plan to use Tesla’s drivetrain for the next generation electric B-class.
Here’s the full report from NHTSA:
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Is it *actually* a Tesla part that’s faulty, or a DAG part?
I get the impression that it’s a DAG part (the gateway) sending the wrong data to a Tesla motor. As you can see from http://ecarproject.ch/index.php/2015/06/14/tesla-model-s-drivetrain-hacked/ the Tesla motor and drivetrain will happily accept commands from a 3rd party module. The so called gateway doesn’t sound to be a Tesla part, but I could be wrong. If it is a DAG part at fault, then the headline is misleading.
The NHTSA lists Tesla as the supplier of the part at fault. Look at the embed report.
My mistake, didn’t spot that bit in the report. Yeah, bit of a shame about that, and quite surprised too. I guess it shows how seamless an OTA update would make this fix.
I didn’t even know this existed. I read the article and got excited, then I realized that it has 177 horsepower and 87 miles of range….hardly Tesla like performance or range. I with the tesla RAV4 was around still and had wider availability
never mind, looks like the rav4 wasn’t really tesla like either in terms of performance and range. I guess its a result of the pricing not allowing them to use a large enough battery