- US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says he’s more worried about Iran than climate change.
- Why Bernie Sanders’ expensive, radical plan to tackle the climate crisis just might work.
- Not everyone at Davos is “elite”: Meet the youth climate activists who slept in tents in the snow.
- And more…
US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was interviewed on CNBC’s Squawk Box in Davos on Thursday about his comments about climate change — the theme of the World Economic Forum at Davos — and why he made disparaging comments about climate activist Greta Thunberg (he said he was joking). He said:
After [Thunberg] goes and studies economics in college she can come back and explain that to us.
(Writer’s note: When you’ve not got a good counter-argument, revert to personal attacks veiled as “jokes.” Pretty sad, Mnuchin.)
My gap year ends in August, but it doesn’t take a college degree in economics to realise that our remaining 1,5° carbon budget and ongoing fossil fuel subsidies and investments don’t add up. 1/3 pic.twitter.com/1virpuOyYG
— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) January 23, 2020
The US government continues to roll back EPA regulations — the latest being the removal of pollution controls on 60% of US streams and wetlands. This will allow landowners and property developers to dump pollutants such as pesticides and fertilizers directly into waterways.
Mnuchin stated, “If you look at what the US has been doing on its own without government intervention, industry has gotten a lot more efficient on carbon emissions… We think industry can deal with this on its own.”
He then finished the interview by saying, “We’re much more focused on Iran having nuclear weapons.”
You can watch the interview below:
Now, let’s look at a different point of view from Mnuchin’s non-government-intervention philosophy when it comes to the climate crisis. In an opinion piece for NBC News, the editor of Radical Urbanist, Paris Marx, argues why presidential candidate Bernie Sanders’ climate-crisis plan, which he says is radical and expensive, could actually work. Here’s an excerpt:
The two largest emitting sectors in the United States are transportation and electricity production, accounting for 29% and 28% of total emissions, respectively. All of the candidates have plans to move from fossil fuels to renewables, but Sanders supports public ownership of utilities while Warren does not. Taking utilities out of the private market would allow for a more rapid transition because the government would directly decide how electricity is generated instead of trying to influence private companies.
You can read the entire article here.
Young delegates from all over the world attended the World Economic Forum at Davos and camped out in snowy sub-zero temperatures as part of a collaborative protest. They’ve chosen to stay at Arctic Basecamp, which is made up of a team of scientists and has been running for four years.
— Arctic Basecamp (@ArcticBasecamp) January 22, 2020
Vanessa Nakate, a climate activist from Uganda, told CNBC:
We are just trying to show them that we are doing the right thing despite the fact that we are not sleeping or staying in the best conditions. And, as [delegates] are enjoying their first class [flights], they should know that there are people who are actually living in worse conditions.
So, we are practically representing those people who are already facing the impact of the climate crisis. It is time to get out of our comfort zones.
US youth delegate Eva Jones explained how they keep warm:
It’s better if we all cozy up together like little sardines. I think we had eight people in our tent last night… and I was so grateful to be right between them because both of them were emanating heat.
Kaime Silvestre, a climate activist from Brazil, said:
It is a form of protest.
Global management consulting giant McKinsey & Company released a report this week called, “Climate Risk and Response: Physical Hazards and Socioeconomic Impacts.” Here are their key findings:
Climate change is already having substantial physical impacts at a local level in regions across the world; the affected regions will continue to grow in number and size.
The socioeconomic impacts of climate change will likely be nonlinear as system thresholds are breached and have knock-on effects.
The global socioeconomic impacts of climate change could be substantial as a changing climate affects human beings, as well as physical and natural capital.
Financial markets could bring forward risk recognition in affected regions, with consequences for capital allocation and insurance.
Countries and regions with lower per capita GDP levels are generally more at risk.
Addressing physical climate risk will require more systematic risk management, accelerating adaptation, and decarbonization.
Jonathan Woetzel, McKinsey global institute director and senior partner of McKinsey Shanghai, said:
Much as thinking about information systems and cyber-risks has become integrated into corporate and public-sector decision making, climate change and its resulting risks will also need to feature as a major factor in decisions.
The intent of this report is to clarify and quantify the level of systemic physical risk that is currently accumulating, so that it can be taken into account by insurers, investors, lenders, governments, regulators, non-financial corporations and individuals as they make strategic decisions.
You can read the report here.
What happens when teratonnes of carbon are emitted to the atmosphere? Dr. Jennifer Margaret Galloway, a paleontologist at Aarhus University in Denmark, explains. Take just 13.5 minutes out of your life to watch and learn about exactly what’s going on on our planet right now. Because… science.
Britain’s Prince Charles returned to Davos on Wednesday after a 30-year hiatus, on the 50th anniversary of the annual WEF summit in Switzerland.
The Prince of Wales spoke for a half hour about climate change and sustainability, and launched a new Sustainable Markets Initiative.
The Sustainable Markets Initiative “brings together leading international figures to find ways to rapidly decarbonize the global economy and make the transition to sustainable markets.”
He met with climate activist Greta Thunberg afterward, and said:
Everything I have tried to do, and urge, over the past 50 years has been done with our children and grandchildren in mind.
— Clarence House (@ClarenceHouse) January 22, 2020
Click here to read Prince Charles’ opening statements excerpt, and Electrek’s Take on Prince Charles’ speech and what it means for decarbonization efforts.
Starbucks announced this week that it would slash its waste, water use, and carbon emissions by 50% by 2030.
The initiative would have five main goals: add more menu items that are ‘plant-based’; shift from single-use to reusable packaging; invest in new farming and forestry practices that conserve water; reduce material waste and food waste through better recycling; and develop more ‘eco-friendly stores, operations, manufacturing, and delivery.’
The coffee giant’s plan covers its entire global operations, including water, dairy, and its 31,000 stores. Alternative milks are going to play a big part in the company’s plan.
As we approach our 50th anniversary, we look ahead with a heightened sense of urgency and conviction that we must take care of the planet we share. pic.twitter.com/R7xKijZwVx
— Kevin Johnson (@Kevin_Johnson) January 21, 2020
Starbucks successfully switched to ethically produced beans for nearly all of its coffee supply and moved to energy-efficient buildings. But to date, it has struggled with waste reduction and recycling.
Check out our past editions of Climate Crisis Weekly.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.