Tesla presented misleading ‘Full Self-Driving’ safety data to European regulators

Tesla presented self-published and inflated “Full Self-Driving” safety statistics directly to government regulators in Sweden and the Netherlands as it lobbied for European approval, according to correspondence obtained by Reuters through public records requests.

The data includes a claim that FSD could have “saved 32,000 lives” — a figure that independent researchers say is based on the absurd assumption that every vehicle in the U.S., including freight trucks and motorcycles, would be replaced by an FSD-enabled Tesla.

Tesla’s inflated safety pitch to European regulators

As we reported last month, a Reuters investigation found that Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” safety statistics are deeply misleading, relying on invalid data comparisons that exaggerate the system’s safety record. Ten of 11 independent traffic-safety researchers who reviewed Tesla’s methodology called it misleading marketing, not a serious safety study.

Now Reuters has obtained documents showing Tesla used those same inflated statistics when directly lobbying European regulators.

In a November 2024 letter to RDW, the Dutch road authority, Tesla provided a link to its safety report and claimed “increased usage” of FSD “leads to safer roads.” After more than a year of testing and discussions, RDW approved FSD for use in the Netherlands in April — and is now seeking EU-wide approval on behalf of Tesla.

RDW told Reuters it “does not rely on marketing claims or external statistics” and performs its own “tests, analyses and verifications” on public roads and test tracks. But the agency did not say whether it actually assessed the validity of Tesla’s U.S. safety statistics.

The 32,000 lives claim

Soon after the Dutch approval on April 10, Tesla policy manager Ivan Komusanac emailed Swedish regulators asking for similar FSD approval. He attached a slide presentation displaying the exaggerated claim that Teslas using FSD can travel more than seven times farther between crashes than the average U.S. human driver.

The presentation also claimed FSD could have potentially saved 32,000 lives and prevented 1.9 million injuries.

The problem with these figures is well-documented. As we’ve covered extensively, Elon Musk’s claim that FSD is “10 times safer” than human drivers doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. Tesla compares a rate of crashes in FSD-equipped Teslas that triggered airbag deployments to a U.S. crash rate for all vehicles that includes far less severe accidents — an apples-to-oranges comparison that inflates the safety margin by a factor of three.

Tesla also compares its cars to the average U.S. vehicle, which is about 12 years old. That distorts results because newer vehicles across all brands have better safety features that reduce crash rates. A new Toyota Camry is also safer than the average U.S. vehicle — that doesn’t prove Toyota has cracked autonomous driving.

The “32,000 lives saved” claim takes this already-inflated methodology and applies it to an absurd scenario: replacing every vehicle in the U.S. — trucks, motorcycles, everything — with an FSD-enabled Tesla.

European regulators respond — cautiously

The responses from European regulators reveal a mixed picture. Anders Eriksson, an investigator at the Swedish Transport Agency, said regulators “look beyond headline figures” and that any assessment would not be based “solely on aggregated safety claims.” But the regulator didn’t answer Reuters’ questions about what other evidence Tesla actually provided.

Norway’s response was more direct. Stein-Helge Mundal of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration responded to several Tesla enthusiasts who had written urging FSD approval, saying Tesla’s figures “are self-produced,” making it “difficult to find correlation with the authorities’ accident statistics.”

Meanwhile, a Greek regulator cited data “from the other side of the Atlantic” showing FSD “leads to a very significant drop in accidents” — though the transport ministry declined to say whether that data came from Tesla’s own report.

The European Transport Safety Council expressed concern. Dudley Curtis, a spokesperson for the watchdog group, said that if Tesla wants to make safety claims, the company should “give the data to a university, have it independently verified by a qualified researcher, and then let’s talk.”

The stakes for Tesla in Europe

Tesla has said FSD approval in Europe is key to regaining market share in a region where sales plummeted last year amid backlash over Musk’s political activities, including his embrace of far-right European political parties. While Tesla has seen some recovery in recent months, BYD has outsold Tesla in Europe for multiple consecutive months, with Chinese EV makers steadily making inroads.

For EU-wide approval, representatives of 55% of member states making up 65% of the bloc’s population must vote “yes.” Individual countries can approve FSD nationally in the meantime — the Netherlands, Lithuania, Belgium, and Denmark have already done so.

Tesla did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.

Electrek’s Take

This is a significant development. It’s one thing for Elon Musk to post inflated safety statistics on social media — that’s basically par for the course at this point. It’s quite another for Tesla to formally present those same misleading numbers to government regulators as part of an official approval process.

We’ve been saying for years that Tesla’s self-published safety data is deeply problematic. The airbag-deployment-vs-all-crashes comparison is a fundamental methodological flaw that anyone with basic statistical knowledge should catch. The fact that Tesla continues to use this data in official regulatory correspondence, after researchers have publicly debunked it, suggests the company either doesn’t understand the problem or doesn’t care.

The European Transport Safety Council nailed it: if Tesla’s data is legitimate, submit it for independent peer review. The fact that Tesla won’t do this tells you everything you need to know. European regulators should be evaluating FSD based on their own rigorous testing, not on Tesla’s self-serving marketing materials. To their credit, RDW says it did its own testing — but the fact that Tesla even tried this approach with multiple regulators is concerning. As FSD approval spreads across Europe country by country, regulators need to hold a much higher evidentiary bar than whatever slide deck Tesla’s lobbyists email over.

With electricity rates climbing nearly 10% last year, home solar protects you against future rate increases. And with lease and PPA options, you can go solar with zero upfront cost and start saving immediately. If you want to find the best deal, check out EnergySage. It’s a free service with hundreds of pre-vetted installers competing for your business, so you save 20 to 30% compared to going it alone. No sales calls until you pick an installer. Get your free quotes here.