A Tesla owner admitted on video that he drives drunk on Full Self-Driving (FSD) – showing that Tesla doesn’t do enough to prevent abuse of its driver assist system.
29-year-old social media personality Landon Bridges went on comedian Bert Kreischer’s cooking show ‘Something’s Burning’ this week.
During the show, they were drinking, and Bridges admitted to being drunk. While visibly intoxicated, he accepted another drink from Kreischeir and then added:
“You know what’s the biggest game changer for me in 2025? I bought a Tesla, and it has Autopilot.”
He then looked at Kreischer suggestively – hinting that you can use it when drunk.
Kreischer responded: “Does it work like that?” – suggesting that it is good enough to use while intoxicated – and then said in a drunk voice: “Tesla, take me home.”
The only correct answer here would be: “No, it’s a driver assistance system and the driver is always responsible for the vehicle and therefore, they can’t be intoxicated to supervise the system.”
Instead, Bridges said:
Yeah. That’s the problem. That’s literally the problem. I’ll go after it. I’ll press the home button (in the navigation system), and as long as you look forward, you are home.
He then suggested that Kreisher, known for his heavy drinking, should consider getting a Tesla with Full Self-Driving.
Here’s the part of the episode where they have the conversation:
Electrek’s Take
This is wild. He openly admits to a potential felony on a YouTube show. The way he is thinking proves that Tesla is not doing enough to communicate to its owners that FSD is not a self-driving system, but rather a driver assistance system that requires the driver’s full attention, meaning sober, at all times.
He says “Autopilot”, but the way he describes the system points to it being “Full Self-Driving (Supervised)” as Autopilot wouldn’t be able to take you through surface streets to take you home.
The names of the ADAS systems themselves are confusing, as evidenced by Bridges, a new Tesla owner, not being able to distinguish between Autopilot and FSD.
Tesla has been extremely careless in how it discusses its system publicly.
For example, Tesla recently tweeted that “FSD Supervised gives you back time”:
This suggests that you can do something else while driving, but this is not true based on the automaker’s own warnings and owner’s manual. The driver needs to be paying attention to the vehicle’s driving at all times and be ready to take control.
It is a direct contrast to how Tesla discusses FSD in court after being sued over the numerous accidents involving Autopilot and Full Self-Driving.
In court, Tesla is quick to remind everyone that the driver is always responsible for the vehicle and that, despite its name, Full Self-Driving is only a level 2 driver assistance system, not a level 3-5 automated driving system.
Tesla needs to bring that same energy to its communications with buyers. Otherwise, it contributes to these morons thinking that they can use FSD drunk.
Top comment by Beario
While I understand the reasoning for bringing attention to this, it is also worth mentioning that people are going to continue to abuse these things regardless of what anyone says. There have been numerous devices sold to help people bypass the system including steering wheel weights and other items. There can be modifications to the software to identify an intoxicated driver, I believe Volvo worked on it for some time. FSD is marketed improperly and that will only encourage misuse. It won't be the last time we will see someone misusing the software like this and that's something that needs to be addressed.
I hope Bridges realizes the carelessness and the danger of his behavior and suggests that others, like Kreischer, should do it.
But it wouldn’t be the first time a Tesla owner would think it OK to use FSD while drunk. We even learned of a crash in 2022 where a Tesla employee decided to use FSD, according to a witness, after day drinking, and his drive ended in a crash, leaving him dead.
Yes, FSD can perform all the tasks related to driving, but it can’t do it reliably enough over long distances without driver intervention, meaning it’s not a self-driving system. It can do the worst thing at the worst time and if the driver is not ready to prevent it, it can mean death.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Comments